Profit by Quality/品質でもうけなさいin English | drawn & written by Isao Hirasawa Omoshirogari HOME |
2.4 Quality is not visible by the number of cases. | Profit by Quality《Contents》 | ||||||||||||
Prologue | |||||||||||||
T.Way of thinking quality and cost | |||||||||||||
[Problem 2] |
There are no feelings to which quality became good in the defective number becoming fewer by improvement. | 1. Company without problem cannot profit 2. Good or bad quality is known at cost |
|||||||||||
2.1 Let’s think over the meaning of quality 2.2 Is quality "goodness"? 2.3 If quality is good, productivity is also high. 2.4 Quality is not visible by the number of cases. 2.5 Grasp quality with cost. 2.6 Level of quality control |
|||||||||||||
3. 品質保証とはどういうことか? | |||||||||||||
U.Way of solution quality problem | |||||||||||||
4. Make problem solving efficient. 5. Shares a problem by visualization 6. Dig into, and get clue of solution 7. Don't take unprofitable measure |
|||||||||||||
V.Consultation example of quality problem | |||||||||||||
8. Consultation example of quality problem 9. Necessary way of thinking to raise level Epilogue |
|||||||||||||
This is an example of the company which is advancing improvement-in-quality activity comparatively eagerly. The subsection chief and leader of the spot are satisfied with the activity cleared favorably of the target. Communication with a subordinate is also active and the mood in the workplace is not bad. Nevertheless, trouble of the manager who is higher than a section manager is... |
|||||||||||||
《Omoshirogari HOME》 | |||||||||||||
Recommended Program |
|||||||||||||
This is a typical example getting a wrong how to catch quality. | |||||||||||||
It is right that the upper graph expresses as follows. | |||||||||||||
Although the defective number may be able to be reduced, if we look for a loss of defective, quality doesn’t improve at all. In short, they are such things. |
|||||||||||||
Even if the defective number decreases, quality doesn't necessarily become good! | |||||||||||||
Because it’s quickly transposed to a numerical value when evaluating quality, it tries to use the number of fault or complaints. Such a company…there’re quite a lot. And most of them hold the common trouble like the example. Some companies use the number alternatively for the reason grasp of cost is not easy, but it’s impossible that the quality improvement achieves the success with an actual feeling as far as they use a number evaluation resignedly. Because quality is loss (cost), the result expected will not be obtained if the evaluation index of an improvement is not cost. |
|||||||||||||
far from it, advocate improvement target with cost. It must become intense motivation. |
|||||||||||||
So, we should consider how to grasp cost. In fact, grasp of quality cost is not so difficult as it is so much worried. |
★ Click here to inquire of consulting, seminars and to request of documents. ★ Please point it out if you become aware of strange English. (email) |
〈2.4 Quality is not visible by the number of cases.〉Top | NEXT | |||
Copyright (C) omoshirogari. All Rights Reserved. |